Readings on Infrastructure after seminar 11 February, 2020:
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan L. Star. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1999.
Bialski, Paula, Finn Brunton and Mercedez Bunz. Communication. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2019.
Edwards, Paul N. “The Mechanics of Invisibility: On Habit and Routine as Elements of Infrastructure,” pages 327-36 in Infrastructure Space. Edited by I. Ruby & A. Ruby. Berlin: Ruby Press, 2017.
- Check out Edwards’ Academia.edu page: https://stanford.academia.edu/PaulNEdwards
Innis, Harold. Empire and Communication. London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2007.
Kittler, Friedrich. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
Latour, Bruno. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2013.
Law, John. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge, 2004.
MacLuhan, Marschall. Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1994.
MacFadden, Margaret. Golden Cables of Sympathy: The Transatlantic Sources of Ninteenth Century Feminism. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 1999.
Morley, David. Communications and Mobility: The Migrant, the Mobile Phone, and the Container Box. Hoboken , NJ.: Willey-Blackwell, 2017.
Parks, Lisa, and Nicole Starosielski (eds) Signal Traffic: Critical Studies of Media Infrastructures (The Geopolitics of Information). Urbana, Chicago and Springfield: University of Illinois Press, 2015.
Peters, John Durham. The Marvelous Clouds: Towards a Philosophy of Elemental Media. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
Sundin, Olof. “Janitors of Knowledge: Constructing Knowledge in the Everyday Life of Wikipedia Editors,” Journal of Documentation 67/5 (2011): 840-862.
Sundin, Olof, and Jutta Haider (eds.) Invisible Search and Online Search Engines: The Ubiquity of Search in Everyday Life. London: Routledge, 2019.
Tung-Hui Hu, A Prehistory of the Cloud. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2015.
Ytreberg, Espen. “Networked Simultaneities in the Time of the Great Exhibitions: Media and the 1914 Oslo Centenary Jubilee Exhibition,” International Journal of Communication 10 (2016): 5284-5303.
Readings for trip to National Library, 12 Nov 2019:
Greg Anderson, “Retrieving the Lost Worlds of the Past: The Case for an Ontological Turn,” American Historical Review (2015), 786-81.
Michel Foucault, “Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias,” Architecture/Mouvement/Continuité (1984/1967), 1-9.
Readings suggested on the National Library visit, 12 Nov 2019, especially connected to “the ontological turn”. Thanks Erling, Line, and Liv Ingeborg!
Michael Bentley, “Past and ‘Presence’: Revisiting Historical Ontology”, History and Theory, Vol. 45, No. 3 (Oct., 2006), 349-361
Catherine Mike Chin. “Marvelous Things Heard: On Finding Historical Radiance.” The Massachusetts Review 58/3 (2017): 478-91.
Ewa Domanska, “The Material Presence of the Past”, History and Theory, Vol. 45, No. 3 (Oct., 2006), 337-348
Stephen Justice, “Did the Middle Ages Believe in Their Miracles?”, Representations 103 (2008), 1-29
Eelco Runia, “Spots of Time “, History and Theory, Vol. 45, No. 3 (Oct., 2006), 305-316
Readings for Seminar, 17 Sept 2019:
Ernst Robert Curtius, European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, Europäische Literatur Und Lateinisches Mittelalter (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1953), 3-16.
Ernst Robert Curtius, European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, Europäische Literatur Und Lateinisches Mittelalter (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1953), 128-144.
Readings on literary tropes, metaphors, and genres suggested by Brent Nongbri after the Curtius seminar 17 September 2019:
Michael Peppard, The Son of God in the Roman World (OUP, 2012)
Metaphors die when, through repeated use, they cease to provoke comparison. Metaphors can be resurrected by placing them within different generative contexts. “Son of God” is, in the context of contemporary biblical scholarship, a dead metaphor because we think we know what it means, that it has a stable referent. It is “resurrected” through consideration of the language of “Son of God” in pre-Nicene contexts.
Harold Attridge, “Genre Bending in the Fourth Gospel,” Journal of Biblical Literature 121 (2002), 3-21
A series of identifications of classical tropes and genres within the Gospel According to John with demonstrations of ways in which generic expectations are regularly upended by the author of the gospel.
Eva Mroczek, The Literary Imagination in Jewish Antiquity (OUP 2016)
Exquisite reflection on tropes and metaphors of textual growth in antiquity (Ben Sira) and ancient techniques of attribution and authorship (Psalms), among other topics.
Michael Peppard, “ ‘Poetry’, ‘Hymns’, and ‘Traditional Material’ in New Testament Epistles, Or, How to Do Things with Indentations,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 30 (2008), 319-342
Part of the training of biblical scholars involves the identification of various forms within texts. One of the attractions of having discovered a “form” within a text is that the form will inevitable be earlier than the text. If enough of the guild accepts the identification of a form, editorial conventions, like block indentation, ossify the form for all future readers (beautifully illustrated with the history of interpretation of the “hymn” in Philippians).
Stephen D. Moore, God’s Gym: Divine Male Bodies of the Bible (Routledge, 1996)
The best book at identifying (and justifiably mocking) the rhetorical tropes of late-twentieth century biblical scholars. Also among my top 10 favorite books. Maybe top 5.